Review



analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software version 9.4  (SAS institute)


Bioz Verified Symbol SAS institute is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    SAS institute analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software version 9.4
    Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Using Statistical Analysis System (Sas) Software Version 9.4, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software version 9.4/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software version 9.4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software version 9.4  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software version 9.4
    Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Using Statistical Analysis System (Sas) Software Version 9.4, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software version 9.4/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software version 9.4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    analysis of variance (anova) with tukey’s post hoc test using graphpad prism 5 statistics software  (GraphPad Software Inc)
    90
    GraphPad Software Inc analysis of variance (anova) with tukey’s post hoc test using graphpad prism 5 statistics software
    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) <t>Percentage</t> <t>GT/CAT</t> formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way <t>ANOVA</t> with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).
    Analysis Of Variance (Anova) With Tukey’s Post Hoc Test Using Graphpad Prism 5 Statistics Software, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/analysis of variance (anova) with tukey’s post hoc test using graphpad prism 5 statistics software/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance (anova) with tukey’s post hoc test using graphpad prism 5 statistics software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    multivariate analysis of variance (manova) followed by tukey post hoc tests using sas statistical analysis software  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute multivariate analysis of variance (manova) followed by tukey post hoc tests using sas statistical analysis software
    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) <t>Percentage</t> <t>GT/CAT</t> formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way <t>ANOVA</t> with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).
    Multivariate Analysis Of Variance (Manova) Followed By Tukey Post Hoc Tests Using Sas Statistical Analysis Software, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/multivariate analysis of variance (manova) followed by tukey post hoc tests using sas statistical analysis software/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    multivariate analysis of variance (manova) followed by tukey post hoc tests using sas statistical analysis software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    standard analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas v9.4) software package  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute standard analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas v9.4) software package
    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) <t>Percentage</t> <t>GT/CAT</t> formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way <t>ANOVA</t> with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).
    Standard Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Using Statistical Analysis System (Sas V9.4) Software Package, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/standard analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas v9.4) software package/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    standard analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas v9.4) software package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software, version 9.3  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software, version 9.3
    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) <t>Percentage</t> <t>GT/CAT</t> formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way <t>ANOVA</t> with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).
    Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Using Statistical Analysis System (Sas) Software, Version 9.3, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software, version 9.3/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance (anova) using statistical analysis system (sas) software, version 9.3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    analysis of variance using sas 9.0 statistical software  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute analysis of variance using sas 9.0 statistical software
    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) <t>Percentage</t> <t>GT/CAT</t> formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way <t>ANOVA</t> with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).
    Analysis Of Variance Using Sas 9.0 Statistical Software, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/analysis of variance using sas 9.0 statistical software/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance using sas 9.0 statistical software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    analysis of variance (anova) using minitab 2000 version 13.2 statistical software  (Minitab Inc)
    90
    Minitab Inc analysis of variance (anova) using minitab 2000 version 13.2 statistical software
    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) <t>Percentage</t> <t>GT/CAT</t> formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way <t>ANOVA</t> with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).
    Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Using Minitab 2000 Version 13.2 Statistical Software, supplied by Minitab Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/analysis of variance (anova) using minitab 2000 version 13.2 statistical software/product/Minitab Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance (anova) using minitab 2000 version 13.2 statistical software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    analysis of variance using statistical analysis system software  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute analysis of variance using statistical analysis system software
    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) <t>Percentage</t> <t>GT/CAT</t> formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way <t>ANOVA</t> with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).
    Analysis Of Variance Using Statistical Analysis System Software, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/analysis of variance using statistical analysis system software/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance using statistical analysis system software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    analysis of variance (anova) tukey’s test using statistical analysis software, proc-glm  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute analysis of variance (anova) tukey’s test using statistical analysis software, proc-glm
    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) <t>Percentage</t> <t>GT/CAT</t> formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way <t>ANOVA</t> with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).
    Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Tukey’s Test Using Statistical Analysis Software, Proc Glm, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/analysis of variance (anova) tukey’s test using statistical analysis software, proc-glm/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance (anova) tukey’s test using statistical analysis software, proc-glm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    analysis of variance (anova) using minitab version 14 statistical software  (Minitab Inc)
    90
    Minitab Inc analysis of variance (anova) using minitab version 14 statistical software
    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) <t>Percentage</t> <t>GT/CAT</t> formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way <t>ANOVA</t> with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).
    Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Using Minitab Version 14 Statistical Software, supplied by Minitab Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/analysis of variance (anova) using minitab version 14 statistical software/product/Minitab Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance (anova) using minitab version 14 statistical software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) Percentage GT/CAT formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).

    Journal: Journal of Fungi

    Article Title: Differential Physiological Prerequisites and Gene Expression Profiles of Conidial Anastomosis Tube and Germ Tube Formation in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides

    doi: 10.3390/jof7070509

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Germ tube formation and conidial anastomosis tube fusion dynamics in C. gloeosporioides . ( A ) Percentage GT/CAT formation in different aged conidia, viz., 6, 10, 13, and 17 days of C. gloeosporioides . ( B ) Percentage CAT fusion in 17 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. ( C ) Percentage GT formation in 6 days old conidia of C. gloeosporioides incubated for different incubation times, viz., 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. ( D ) Percentage CAT fusion in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 17-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of water. ( E ) Percentage GT formation in different conidial densities, viz., 4 × 10 2 , 4 × 10 3 , 4 × 10 4 , 4 × 10 5 , and 4 × 10 6 of 6-day-old conidia incubated in 1 mL of PDB. ( F ) CAT and GT formation percentage in PDB, water, glucose, and Insolution ™ PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK), CAT fusion induced in water supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059; GT formation was assayed in PDB supplemented with glucose and Insolution ™ PD98059. GT/CAT formation was quantified as the percentage of conidia involved in GT/CAT formation. Average from three replicates ( n = 3), and 300 conidial numbers were counted per replicate. Bar indicates standard deviation. Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (bars with the same letter are not significantly different; p ≤ 0.05).

    Article Snippet: The GT formation and CAT fusion data were analyzed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test using GraphPad Prism 5 Statistics Software.

    Techniques: Incubation, Standard Deviation, Comparison